Leadership theories abound. Trait theory studies were discontinued at Ohio State when the number of traits exceeded hundreds. Path-goal theory. Contingency Theory. And many more. SO many wonderful scholars have commented on this topic. John Kotter, Kouzes and Posner, Henry Mintzberg, and many more.
“Leadership” occurs at different levels and in different contexts and the attributes that might suit one situation may not fit another. Is leadership transportable? That’s been a big debate for a long time.
If we are talking about executive level leadership, leading an organization in the blue waters of shark-filled oceans, then IMO
- Clarity of purpose and vision—something people can believe in and commit deeply to. What’s your purpose for existing (one sentence) and where in detail do you see the organization being in 10, 20, 50 years?
- Determination to make that mission and vision achieved—never give up.
- Ability to connect with and influence others—to sell your mission and vision (not the same things) so that others want to follow you. Including a good sense of humor. (More "soft skills")
- Thick skin—no matter what you do, some will strive to take you out. It’s part of the role, just acknowledge and move on.
- Care for the Commons—air, water, soil, flora, fauna, and Others. Don't pollute. Leave the world cleaner than you found it.
- Desire to be a net-contributor, not a net-extractor—give more than you take. Build society not your own net-worth.
- Deep integrity—truth telling, promise keeping, respect for others, fairness. No lying cheating stealing or deceiving. (Thanks Rich Teerlink of Harley Davidson)
- Global Perspective--organizations compete across oceans and national boundaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment